Author

Study type

Tesla

MR type

No pt.

Statisticsa (%)

ADC

(×10−3 mm2/sec)

Present study

Prospective

3

T2W, T1W, DWI

28

Sens: 61.9 - 66.7 Spec: 42.9 - 57.1

1.89 ± 0.53

Wu et al. [9] 2013

Prospective

3

T2, DWI

362

T2 + DWI:

Sens: 89 - 94 Spec: 93 - 100 Accuracy: 92 - 98

-

Kobayashi et al. [7] 2011

Prospective

1.5

T2, DW

104

DWI sens: 91.3 - 92.0 T2 sens: 89.4 - 91.0

0.39 - 2.07

Avcu et al. [8] 2011

Prospective

1.5

T2, DWI

63 patients + 20 healthy controls

Sens: 100.0 Spec: 76.5 PPV: 92.0 NPV: 100.0 Accuracy: 93.7

1.07 ± 0.26

Abou-El-Ghar et al. [10] 2009

Prospective

1.5

T2, DWI

130

Sens: 98.1 Spec: 92.3 PPV: 100 NPV: 92.3 Accuracy: 97

-

Watanabe et al. [15] 2009

Retrospective

1.5

T1, T2, DWContrast series

18

T1W + T2W + DWI:

Sens: 40.0 Spec: 93.0

-

El-Assmy et al. [12] 2008

Prospective

1.5

T2, DWI

43

Sens: 100.0 PPV: 100.0

1.40 ± 0.51

El-Assmy et al. [11] 2009

Prospective

1.5

T2, DWI

106

DWI: Sens: 98.1, PPV: 100 T2: Sens: 96.2 PPV: 100

-

Matsuki et al. [6] 2007b

Retrospective

1.5

DWI

15

Sens: 100.0 Spec: 100.0b

1.18 ± 0.21